So much bat-shit crazy raving, so little time in the session.
Okay, I was just kidding above. THIS is bat-shit crazy:
"If we can establish that they`re a person before pregnancy, and they`re a person after pregnancy, then it seems, well, it offends reason to say that they`re not a person during that pregnancy," (italics mine)
Offends reason? This doesn't even get you off the block on that transatlantic voyage. But then, these misogyahoos wouldn't recognize sweet reason if it bit 'em in the ankle.
What's that you say? Can't follow the iron logic from pre-pregnancy to term? Silly you. Trusty-dusty TV will straighten you right out.
There now, all unconfused, right? And, would you agree that ND C.A.U.S.E. needs a brush-up on its primary mission when it can't quite decide if this slap-in-the-kisser of a bill might restrict or prohibit contraception use for ALL women, not just in emergency situations? Makes one wonder about the state of reason (let alone peace) all around in the Peace Garden State.
gal CHOICE AT RISK ATTEMPTS TO ESTABLISH FETAL RIGHTS ACROSS THE LAND alternet 03-15-11
Nigel Watson freethinker 727.493.1990 skype freesense@gmail.com
Blog: ORBizen Memo http://orbizenmemo.blogspot.com/
There is no greater disaster than greed. – Lao-tzu
If it's true that we are here to help others, then what, exactly, are the others here for?
No comments:
Post a Comment